LANGUAGE RESOURCES AS A PERSPECTIVE FOR PRESERVING THE ETHNIC IDENTITY AND REACHING FULL INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Author(s): 
List of sections: 
Language theory
Mounth / Year: 
2016, September
Issue of the journal: 
11
Pages: 
21-33
Type of the article: 
Scientific article
Abstract: 

Language as the microcosm of a human being and his environment is the basic tool for intercultural communication. Its natural resources (anthropological nature, relativism of its cultural tint, cognitive and conceptual structure, “inbuilt” semantic matrix and expressive inclination to strong unification, deictic “magnetism”, conversational distribution and discourse-based profile, as well as ubiquitous intertextuality) “guarantee” the undisturbed communication and integration of civilizations, unless there is a “deliberate” misuse of this natural supranational richness.

Keywords: 
language, speech acts, cultural anthropology, cognitivism, semantic universalia, comparison, emotion, deixis, communication, discourse, intertext
References: 

1. Ampel' 1978: Ampel, Teresa. Elipsa i powtórzenie w żywej mowie. W: Studia nad składnią polszczyzny mówionej. Skubalanka, Teresa (red.) – Wrocław., Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1978, 177–182.
2. Apresjan 1986: Apresjan, Ju. Nekotor'ie soobrazhenija o dejksise v svjazi s ponjatiem naivnoj modeli mira [Some considerations about the deixis in connection with the concept of the naive model of the world], [V:] Teoria tekstu [Textual theories]. Zbiór studiów. (Ed.) T. Dobrzyńska, Kraków – Wrocław., Ossolineum, 1986, 83–98.
3. Bart 2005: Bart, R. Rolan Bart for Rolan Bart. – Sofija., CREDO, 2005.
4. Bart 2009: Barthes, R. Podstawy semiologii. Kraków., WUJ, 2009.
5. Vezhbickaja 1999: Wierzbicka, A. Język – Umysł – Kultura. - Warszawa., PWN, 1999.
6. Vezhbickaja 2010: Wierzbicka, A. Semantyka. Jednostki elementarne i uniwersalne. – Lublin., WUMCS, 2010.
7. Gzhmil-Tilutki 2010: Grzmil-Tylutki, Halina. Francuska teoria dyskursu. – Kraków., UNIVERSITAS, 2010.
8. Glovin'skij 2000b: Głowiński, M. Intertekstualność, groteska, parodia (Szkice ogólne i interpretacje. – Kraków., Universitas, 2000.
9. Zalevskaja 2012: Zalevskaja, A.A. Znachenie slova i metafora „zhivojpolikodovyj gipertekst” [The meaning and metaphor "living polycoded hypertext"], in: Ways of solving crisis phenomena in Pedagogics, Psychology and Linguistics: Materials digest of the XXXI International Research and Practice Conference and the III stage of the Championship in pedagogical and psychological sciences, the II stage of the Championship in philological sciences. - London, IASHE, 2012,. pp. 189–191; Access mode: http://gisap.eu/ru/node/12631.
10. Kassirer 1998: Kasirer, E. Ezik#t. Filosofija na simvolichnite formi [Philosophy of symbolic forms]., Volume I. – Sofija., Eurasia, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.5840/newvico19981615
11. Krejpo 2000: Krejpo, Richli H. Kulturna antropologija [Cultural anthropology]. – Sofija., Leek, 2000.
12. Krysteva 1969: Kristeva, J. Sémioticè. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Essais. – Paris., 1969.
https://doi.org/10.2307/40125027
13. Losev 2004: Losev, A. Samoto samó. – Sofija., Zaharij Stojanov, 2004.
14. Puzinina 1997: Puzynina, Jadwiga. Słowo – Wartość – Kultura. – Lublin., KUL, 1997.
15. Riker 1989: Ricoeur, Paul. Język, tekst, interpretacja. Wybór pism. – Warszawa., PIW, 1989.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2593-9_10
a. Slavkova 2005: Sławkowa, E. Style konwersacyjne w perspektywie komunkacji międzykulturowej., POSTSCRIPTUM, 2005, 2 (50), 46–58.
b. Toporov 1992: Toporov, V.N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz. Issledovanija v oblasti mifopojeticheskogo [Symbol. Form. Research in the field of poetic myths]. – Moskva., Culture, 1992.
c. Toporov 1993: Toporov, V.N. O „rezonantnom” prostranstve literatury (neskol'ko zamechanij) [About the "resonant" space of literature (some observations)]. V: Literary Tradition and Practice in Russian Culture. Ed. By V. Polukhina, J. Andrew, R/Reid. Rodopi, Amsterdam. - Atlanta, 1993, pp. 16–60.
d. Torop 2008: Torop, P. Przekład całkowity. W: Paul Ricoeur, Peeter Torop. O tłumaczeniu. – Gdańsk., WUG, 2008, pp. 63–285.
16. Hamze 2015a: Hamze, D. Rol' dejksisa v groteskogeneze (na materiale tvorchestva V. Gombrovicha) [The role of deixis in the genesis of grotesque (on the basis of creativity of V. Gombrowicz)]. – In: Development of language systems in the context of accelerated dynamics of public relations. Peer-reviewed materials digest (collective monograph) published following the results of the XCVII International Research and Practice Coneference and I stage of the Championship in Philology (London, February 24 – March 02, 2015). Published by IASHE, London, 2015, 2–35., Access mode: http://gisap.eu/ru/node/66329
https://doi.org/10.18007/gisap:ps.v0i9.1258
17. Hamze 2015b: Hamze, D. Kommunikativno-razgovornyj „arsenal” hudozhestvennogo jazyka v groteskno dominirovannom tvorchestve Vitol'da Gombrovicha. In: Development of the spoken and written language at the current stage of the intensive information turnover. London: IASHE, 2015, pp. 23–33., Access mode: http://gisap.eu/ru/node/76763#comment-77502
https://doi.org/10.18007/gisap:ps.v0i10.1277
18. Choran 2006: Choran, E. Nar#chnik po razlozhenie [Manual of decay]. – Sofija., Fakel ekspres [Torch Express], 2006.
a. Jaspers 1994: Jaspers, K. Vvedenie v filosofijata [Introduction to Philosophy]. – Sofija., Oksiart, 1994.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400868612-003